Friday, 25 August 2023

Following the money - part 2: the decision to stop the festivals and Mike Pilavachi's two jobs

This post continues my effort to follow the large gifts received by Soul61 in 2016-2019. It's best if you read the posts in order. The first post is here: Following the money - part 1: the TV connection and questions of control 

It's 2018. This is the year when the new GDPR rules about data arrived. And, in fact, costs related to GDPR show up in the annual report of the Soul Survivor charity. I do not miss the work that year entailed. 

One of the trustees resigned in January 2018 after four years: the well-known worship leader Tim Hughes.

A few months later Soul Survivor took part in Hope Bristol, an event:

"serving the local communities in Bristol on social action projects and sharing the good news of Jesus"

(Source: Group of companies' accounts made up to 31 December 2018 from Soul Survivor filings at Companies House, page 7)

It was a collective effort between Soul Survivor, the Hope organisation and local churches such as the Woodlands group. Soul Survivor took 473 young people along.

Aside from that, the programme of events that ran this year echoes previous years. Naturally Supernatural was now well established in the summer sequence. 

But this was also a momentous year for the charity. In May, they announced they were going to cease their summer festivals, after 27 years in their current form. The now-deleted message [raises eyebrow] said things like:

"We know this will come as a shock to many but we believe that God has spoken and that this is the right time for us to step aside and make space for others to rise up. This is not a decision we have taken lightly but something we have been wrestling with for a substantial amount of time.

Our leadership team and board of trustees came to this decision unanimously and believe that, after 27 years of events, 2019 is the right time for Soul Survivor to end."

I wonder if Tim Hughes, who resigned in January, agreed with this decision? 

A decision of the magnitude of closing the festival would have taken several trustees meetings to decide. Given they say they meet 3-4 times a year,  I think they'll have started talking about this late in 2017 at the latest. 

They go on to say: 

"Soul Survivor isn’t growing as fast as it once was, and it’s hard to balance budgets whilst running a quality event, but we are in a secure financial position. This really is a decision based on what we believe God is saying"

I wonder when they started discussing this action? And when the final decision was made? It's hard to imagine going through the effort of switching locations in 2017, if you knew the festivals would stop soon. 

Equally, 27 years isn't a particularly significant number. Wouldn't you stop at 25 or 30? Maybe Pilavachi's age played a part - he was 60 in 2018.

However the move came about, it was big news. The summer events represented the bulk of the work of the charity, the bulk of the income, and the bulk of the staffing needed.

Transition work began in 2018. The speakers at the summer 2018 events included people who lead other summer festivals: DTI (Dreaming The Impossible) , Limitless and the still-being-developed Satellites. I think that shows an impressive degree of organisation by Soul Survivor.

They say that bookings for Naturally Supernatural were particularly strong this year: up 19% on the year before to 3,251 delegates.

Soul Survivor reported a total income of £2,817,192. They spent £3,151,271. This loss affected their funds: at the end of the year they had £475,531 total funds, compared to £809,701 at the end of 2017. This was the third successive year making a loss. 

I can't find an explicit statement about reserves in the 2018 report, but this seems low to me - less than two months' running costs for the charity.

They list 23 staff on payroll (up from 19 in 2017) this year, with a total cost of £730,622. It seems like an odd time to grow their staff, in light of the decision to end the festivals. Wouldn't one freeze recruitment? 

Who were the staff ? Were they then eligible for redundancy payments the following year? Filling these extra posts was an 18% increase in staffing costs.

Two staff members had salaries in the £60,000-£70,000 bracket. I assume this was Pilavachi and Layzell, the joint Executive Directors. That is an assumption though.

Let's pause here for a minute here and ask a question I should have asked a lot earlier: how does Pilavachi lead both this charity and the church, and travel as a speaker? That seems an incredible amount of work. 

Here he is, speaking at the Vineyard's DTI youth event in June of 2018, one of many speaking trips he took that year:

Pilavachi on stage at DTI

So, was he part-time at the church, or at the charity? There's no mention of that in the reports of either organisation.

And if he is part-time at Soul Survivor, is £60,000-£70,000 an appropriate salary?

This year the charity made gifts to Soul61 of £15,000 and £27,026. 

Soul Survivor Trading made sales of £332,136 in 2018. They incurred costs of £307,543, giving a profit of £25,593. As before these figures are included in the figures quoted for income and expenditure of the charity.

Meanwhile there was a big moment for the church in June. They had a 'giving day' for the Making Room For More building project. It seems to have gone well: they received £1,900,000 in gifts and pledges.

I'm wondering about one aspect of this.  Did the leaders tell the church members about the £200,000 in donations they had received in the last 2 years from YTL Utilities? 

And did they know the £500,000 gift was coming at that stage? In the charity world you often have advanced warning of major gifts arriving. I wonder what they said on that 'giving day'.

Also, remember the £40,000 that was paid from Soul61 to D & J M Morgan Trust for building work? I can't see that money arrive at the church. I've checked the 2017-2018 report that covers until 31st March, and the 2018-2019 report that covers the rest of the year.

I have 5 years of reports for K & J M Morgan Trust. I notice that none of them detail incoming funds from other organisations. I presume they're rolled into the 'Donations' line, joining the gifts from church members.

I find this weak. It creates the situation where they itemise gifts to other organisations, but not gifts from other organisations. It's also inconsistent with the approach taken by the Soul61 and Soul Survivor charities.

In the 2018-2019 financial year, the church reported 18 employees, as with the year before.  The total salary bill was: £477,120.

This year Bob Wallington's post is not listed as being paid for by Soul61.

As in previous years, no employees of the church were paid more than £60,000. 

The total income of the church was £2,022,768, which includes the money raised on the giving day. If we remove the restricted gifts (presumably that's where the building project gifts are noted) then the total income for 2018/2019 is £963,411. Expenditure was £839,578.

And now to Soul61. In the first half of the year, the 2017-2018 cohort of Soul61 gap year students are hard at work. Their year finishes in August after the summer festivals, matching the end of the Soul61 financial year.

At this point the amount left of the first two YTL Utilities gifts is £78,461.

Can we take a moment to appreciate something? Out of just under £122,000 spent so far from the Soul61 large gifts, only about £4,000 has been spent on young leaders, which is the focus of Soul61. 

A new Soul61 financial year begins in September and in November 2018 a new cohort of 18 join, having paid £6,500 in fees for the year. Two interns also join for some, or all, or the financial year.

The Soul61 filings for the 2018-2019 financial year list two employees and a salary bill of £43,652.

Soul61 were charged £10,866 by the other charities for use of their staff time. Actually, this year they provide a breakdown. That charge was all for Soul Survivor staff time.  They made no use of staff time from the church.

And then, sometime before the end of 2018, or early in 2019, the third and largest gift arrives in Soul61.

£500,000

It's an out-sized gift for Soul61 - whose other income for the year is £170,609. 

Will any of it be spent on young leaders? We'll see in the next post that unpacks the events of 2019:

Following the money part 3: concerns about the collection, a mystery money move and who took home more than £90,000?


Sources

This blog draws extensively from the annual reports of the charities. There are too many references to footnote, but you can find the whole reports here:

Sunday, 20 August 2023

Following the money - part 1: the TV connection and questions of control

So, those big gifts. The ones with the contradictions in the Soul61 annual reports. What did the money get used for?

I've been hunting through the annual reports, and have some things to share.

Some caveats... 

This is imperfect. The reports are based on what the trustees decided to share. They may have played up some things  and played down other things. But some of these filings have been audited, which should give us some level of confidence in some of the information.

My purpose here is to follow the money.  I'm aware this means I give little space to many worthwhile activities these organisations do such as worshipping Jesus, caring for each other and serving the wider community.

2016

It's 2016. There are four connected charities in the Soul Survivor world:

  • K & J M Morgan Trust
  • Soul Survivor
  • Soul 61
  • Soul Survivor International 

And one company:

  • Soul Survivor Trading Ltd 

There are a couple of new entries since I last made a list like this. Let me explain.

K & J M Morgan Trust - This is the charity that was used to found Soul Survivor Watford Church. It's where they bank their regular giving. It's where most of the money for salaries comes from. Yes, it has a weird name. 

Soul Survivor Trading Ltd - This is the company that makes money from sales of coffee, books,  merchandise, etc. It's owned by the Soul Survivor charity.

There's a strange thing about these five organisations: they use different financial years: 

Soul Survivor and Soul Survivor Trading Ltd: January to December 

D & J M Morgan Trust and Soul Survivor International: April to March

Soul61: September to August 

When I first came across this, I thought this arrangement was a way to spread the work of the financial year-end. Or to handle the differing cash flows in these different orgs. Others have pointed out that this could be designed to make it harder for trustees, or others, to see what's happening.

Anyway, it's 2016. In the wider world, this was the year the UK voted to leave the European Union.

Mike Pilavachi is joint Executive Director of Soul Survivor with Duncan Layzell. 

Graham Cray, also a trustee of Soul Survivor, is listed as director of Soul Survivor Trading Ltd. 

Pilavachi and Andy Croft are both Senior Pastors of the Watford church. 

Soul61 is led by Andy Croft, at least on paper.

Soul Survivor International is led by Mike Pilavachi, Liz Biddulph, Lambert Dekkers and Matthew Gelding. 

Let's begin with the Soul Survivor charity. They ran 5 major events in 2016: Momentum (aimed at 20s and 30s), Soul Survivor weeks A, B, C and Soul Survivor Scotland (with Scripture Union Scotland).

The annual report this year contains a disturbing phrase I've never seen in a charity report:

"There is ongoing two-way communication, whereby the trustees listen to and take feedback from the executive directors"

(Source: 'Group of companies' accounts made up to 31 December 2016', Soul Survivor filings at Companies House, page 3)

This seems like an attempt to remove power from trustees. Thankfully, Soul Survivor don't make the laws of the UK, but it's a striking indicator of the way this charity operates. I would not be a trustee of a charity that said this in their filings. 

There were also a number of smaller events they ran such as the Loud and Clear Conference  and the Naturally Supernatural event in the winter. Interestingly, that event is jointly run by the church and by the Soul Survivor charity.

A shift is underway in 2016. Croft and Pilavachi had their book Everyday Supernatural published. I imagine that will have been several years in the planning.

Attendance of Soul Survivor Scotland jumped significantly: 23% to 914. Attendance of Weeks B & C of the summer festival declined slightly: 3% and 8% down.  Momentum had a big drop: 41% down to 2,252 full-time attendees.  The report speaks of interest within the charity in doing something around Naturally Supernatural in the summer, in future.

Soul Survivor's total income in 2016 was £3,020,669. Their total expenditure was £3,207,759. So, the charity lost £187,090 this year. 

Their 2016 report lists 18 employees, with a salary bill of £618,415  One of these staff is listed as having a salary between £60,000 and £70,000. I assume this is Pilavachi, due to the length of his tenure and his public prominence, but I could be wrong.

Soul Survivor Trading had sales of £360,174 in 2016. Their expenditure was £305,690. So they made a profit of £53,484. These figures are included in the total income figure I mentioned for Soul Survivor earlier.

We should note that Soul Survivor said this about their trading entity:

"Profitability is not the primary objective, although the subsidiary is operated with the aim of at least breakeven, after allowing a fair allocation of overheads. If the subsidiary does make a profit, this may then be gifted to the parent charity to contribute to the overall work of the group subject to the restrictions in force as the time"

(Source: Group of companies' accounts made up to 31 December 2016, Soul Survivor filings at Companies House, page 8)

Meanwhile, in the April 2016-March 2017 filings for K & J M Morgan Trust, we see the church doing activities that are typical for churches in the UK. They run Sunday services, and small groups, and youth work, and social justice initiatives. 

Some differences exist. This church runs regular Saturday celebrations that draw people from a wider area. They say over 1,000 go to those. They also host some conferences, such as the 3-day Naturally Supernatural event in early 2017, which had over 500 attendees. 

These aspects might be common in large churches. Most of my experience is with smaller churches: those in the 50-200 size. 

Mike Pilavachi travelled regularly overseas to speak at events in 2016, accompanied by his interns. Other people sometimes travel with them. 

The church gives grants to other organisations. Some of these I applaud, for example a gift to Charis

Others raise an eyebrow: their donations to Soul61 are listed here. Sure, that's a separate charity, but Soul61 is run by the same group of people, using the same premises, often serving the other related charities.

In April 2016-March 2017 the church had an income of £986,232. They spent £832,227. 

They employed 21 staff (at least 7 were part-time). The cost for these employees was £443,891. 

None were paid more than £60,000. However, we should note that Pilavachi also had a salary from the Soul Survivor charity during this time. I don't see other income sources for Croft.

An interesting discovery: Bob Wallington held a dual role, described in this way:

"Assistant pastor, (Youth 50% / Soul61 Leadership 50%, funded by Soul61 Trust)"

This entry underlines how labelling the funds given to Soul61 'grants' is misleading.

Speaking of Soul61, in November 2016, they took on a new cohort of 26 gap year students. Between then and the following August two interns also joined Pilavachi as he travelled. 

In their Sept 2016- August 2017 financial year Soul61 recorded one employee, and a salary bill of £18,046.

Staff of the other charities also did work for Soul61, and their employers charged Soul61 for this time. This seems like a sensible way to handle a small charity that can't afford multiple posts. In this financial year the amount they charged Soul61 was: £26,398. There isn't a breakdown of the amount each charity received.

As normal, both Soul Survivor and Soul Survivor Watford donated to Soul61, and money also came from collections taken at both places. 

Soul Survivor International had a much quieter year. The annual report was filed, but there is no incoming or outgoing money listed. That state of affairs continues for the next few years.  

2017

And then, in January 2017, the first big gift arrived: £100,000. 

In a detail that nods towards the weird way they handled this gift, I found this date from the Soul Survivor annual report, rather than the Soul61 annual report. As discussed before, this seems a strange destination for a gift like this. And there are contradictions in the Soul61 report regarding this donation.

By cross-referencing the reports from Soul Survivor and Soul61, we find that sometime before the end of August they spend most of the donated money:

They move £75,000 to the Soul Survivor charity for 'filming '.

This is followed by a further £3,000 in the autumn.

If we look at the Soul Survivor report we learn more:

"A second notable donation received in the year was a £78,000 donation from Soul61, to be used to create broadcast quality footage of NSN and Soul Survivor B. This is in pursuit of our goal of making Christian resources freely available and encouraging young people in their spiritual lives."

(Source: Group of companies' accounts made up to 31 December 2017, Soul Survivor filings at Companies House, page 27)

Later in the same report we read this:

"Funds of £78,000 were allocated to Soul Survivor during 2017 to be used to record content at Naturally Supernatural and Week B and edit them into broadcast quality programming. Since the year-end the programmes have been broadcast on TBN, and subsequently made available on our YouTube channel. The main purpose is to provide teaching and worship resources for people unable to attend the events. Side benefits include documenting what happens at the event, and providing content for marketing the events."

(Source: page 42)

If we jump across to the Soul61 annual report we learn a little more:

"This project created a large quantity of media resources, in the format of teaching during worship meetings and 'edited programmes"

(Source: Total exemption full accounts made up to 31 August 2017, Soul61 filings at Companies House, page 14)

I can't find a record of how, specifically, this money was spent. It could have been some, or all, of the following:

  • Camera equipment
  • Sound recording equipment
  • Editing equipment
  • Freelance camera operators
  • Freelance sound mixers
  • Freelance video editors

I find the TBN connection strange. They don't seem to have a particular affinity with the teenage audience Soul Survivor has typically targeted. But then I guess, Momentum in the last decade was a departure from that, and the Naturally Supernatural event was a further move towards an all-age audience.

It's a lot of money to invest in broadcast quality that you don't need for YouTube or website use. What did they gain from that investment? There's no information given about the TBN audience and the benefits in reaching them this way.

You know who does gain? The speakers on these videos. They get to add 'TV presenting' to their CV. Their fame grows, to some degree.

Sadly there's no record of what actually went out on TBN. It could have been one video or 20 videos.

On the Soul Survivor website we find a section of filmed material that dates after this time.  Perhaps these assets are the result of the investment?

Can we note that one of the events they chose to film was brand-new this year: Naturally Supernatural. That event replaced Momentum, and ran for 6 days. It was pitched at "the whole church family". 

I'm surprised. Wouldn't you pick an event you had a lot of experience running? Perhaps there were other considerations in play.

And now we get to something rather strange.  

If you look up the quoted section above in the report, you'll find this money listed in the 'Restricted funds' section. 

Say what?

A restricted gift is when a donor gives money to a specific part of your mission. For example, you might donate to the Breast Cancer research that Cancer Research UK do. Your gift is specifically for Breast Cancer, you're less interested in funding Lung Cancer research. 

So, how was this money restricted?

I have two ideas. Let me know if you can see any others and I may add them to this post.

Idea 1

The restriction was that the gift was to be used for whatever Mike Pilavachi decided. This condition was noted in some places in the Soul61 report, and contradicted in others. If this it the case then it raises questions like:

  • What happens if he retires before the money is used?
  • Why put the money into the Soul61 charity, as it's the organisation Pilavachi has least formal power over?

Idea 2

The restriction was that the gift was for the purpose of filming. This was a restriction that the original donor never specified. Adding such a restriction may break Charity Commission rules.

This is an intriguing idea. Why would they do that? 

Control.

Maybe the donation was routed via Soul61 to gain control of the funds for this group of Soul61 people:

  • Andy Croft (Director)
  • Mike Pilavachi
  • Ali Martin
  • David Saunderson
  • Liz Biddulph

and remove control of the funds from this group of Soul Survivor people:

  • Mike Pilavachi (Executive director)
  • Duncan Layzell (Executive director)
  • Graham Cray
  • David Westlake
  • Keith Johnson
  • Christopher Lane
  • Jessica Jones
  • Tim Hughes

The latter group would be obliged by Charity Commission rules to spend the money in line with the restriction in these circumstances.

I'm not sure which idea is more credible. Soul Survivor staff or trustees would know the truth here.

How did the Soul Survivor charity fare this year? They had a lot of bookings for Week B of their festival. So many that they decided to run two main venues on the site and use a video link between them. This year they also moved location from Somerset to Cambridgeshire which must have added to the work in running the event.

Total income was £3,210,997. Some of that will be the funding for the filming project. Total expenditure was £3,270,137. Another year of making a loss for Soul Survivor.

They list 19 staff in 2017, with a total salary bill of £615,825. 

The salary of two staff members fell in the £60,000-£70,000 bracket. I assume this is Pilavachi and Layzell.

Meanwhile, Soul Survivor Trading took £425,801 from sales in 2017. Their costs were £496,091. So they lost £71,290. These figures are included in the total income and expenditure of Soul Survivor listed above.

Let's move focus and talk about the buildings of Soul Survivor Watford. They have two on an industrial estate: Number 5 and Number 7. Number 5 is the large space they use for the services. Number 7 is composed of smaller spaces that are also used by other local charities.

Space seems to preoccupy the church during the financial year that starts in April 2017. They say they're seeing 15% growth in their Sunday service. Sometime in this period they engage an architect to draw up plans for how this would work. The effort is titled 'Making room for more'.

The income of K & J M Morgan Trust was £933,764 this year.  They spent £840,315.

They reported 18 employees in this period, 3 less than the previous year. Again, none earned over £60,000.

In September the Soul61 financial year begins. In November, 23 young adults come on board to learn and serve on the gap-year programme. Between now and the following August we have 4 interns listed who shadowed Mike Pilavachi.

And then, of course, the second large gift arrives.

£100,000

At this point we have £25,000 left from the original gift to Soul61. So £125,00 in total.

£3,000 goes to the Soul Survivor charity to finish the filming project. We can see from their filings that this is all spent before the end of 2017.

£40,000 goes to the church to be 'used towards the reconstruction of the Watford church'.

Perhaps this gets used to pay for the architect's work to develop plans. Or, to begin project managing the building work?

Lastly, £3,539 goes to "support potential leaders' travel to Soul Survivor events"


To be continued

There's a lot going on here, I'm sure you'll agree. And we're just getting started. 

Next in the series: Following the money - part 2: the decision to stop the festivals and Mike Pilavachi's two jobs


Sources

This blog draws extensively from the annual reports of the charities. There are too many references to footnote, but you can find the whole reports here:

Soul61 filings at Companies House

Soul Survivor filings at Companies House

Soul Survivor International filings at Companies House

Soul Survivor Trading Limited filings at Companies House

K & J M Morgan Trust report from 2015-2016

K & J M Morgan Trust report from 2016-2017

K & J M Morgan Trust report from 2017-2018


Friday, 11 August 2023

Who paid for the Mike Pilavachi interns?

Remember Mike Pilavachi's interns?  You may recall that they don't pay for the internship. 

So, where does the funding come from for them?

Let me remind you of some other aspects of the operation:

  • Each year 2-4 interns shadowed Pilavachi as he travelled and spoke at events
  • The programme was part of the work of the Soul61 charity
  • Pilavachi selected the interns. There was no advertised way to apply
  • Soul61 was led by Andy Croft, but there seem to be many conflicts of interest that muddy his role

Looking back over the last decade, I see the Soul61 charity receiving money from two main sources.


The festival connection

Firstly, every year a sizeable chunk of money comes from the Soul Survivor charity. This is the charity, led by Mike Pilavachi and Liz Biddulph (until 2014 ), or Mike Pilavachi and Duncan Layzell (from 2014 to 2019), that runs the festivals and other Soul Survivor events such as the Loud and Clear conference.

There are two parts to this money: donations from the charity, and donations from a collection taken at the events the charity runs.

When I say 'donations from the charity', this is Pilavachi and/or Biddulph or Layzell,  granting charity funds to Soul61, to fund work that Pilavachi runs. 

Pilavachi and Biddulph were also trustees of Soul61 (the latter stepped down in 2019).

To fund work that Pilavachi runs? Yep,  most of the donations to Soul61 go on Mike Pilavachi's interns, not on the gap year programme they make lots of noise about.

You can see this in the details of many of the filings for the charity. There is normally a page like this:


(Taken from 'Total exemption full accounts made up to 31 August 2017', page 12)

This example lists the costs of the 'Soul61 course' as £146,794. And the fees paid by participants of that course as £168,682. This year only £1,071 of donations went on the course. Almost all of the donations that came in funded the Mike Pilavachi interns.

The payments from Soul Survivor vary between £12,000 and £15,000. There is a much larger amount the year after the festival stops: £128,732.  (I know,  I know. I'll come back to that in a future post.)

 I wonder if all the trustees knew this money was paying for the interns? The separation of these charities reduces accountability from those people.

We should also note that Soul Survivor gets audited in a different way, by a different company, from Soul61. 

That's permitted, given their income differences. It also means that the auditors may not have been aware how these funds ended up being spent - in some cases on flights to New Zealand for interns.

And then we have the collection that is taken at the festivals and other events.

And this bothers me, to be honest.

Here's how it works. 

Each year there's a moment where they take a collection at the festivals.

Jo Alden, who did the gap year programme one year, remembers the collection as happening:

"towards the end of each week, either the last or penultimate session."

Jeremy Skinner remembers the operation this way:

"The buckets themselves were held by staff/soul61 in pairs, and the delegates would come up to put money in. The pairs weren’t allowed to let the bucket out of their sight. Buckets were loaded into a van and then delivered to collection room. Delivery overseen by finance team" 

Now, a collection in a service doesn't ring alarm bells. What bothers me is how this was pitched to the attendees.

In a previous post I talked about how the Charity Commission is strict that donations must be used for the purpose they're given

So what were the words said from the stage before this collection? 

I hunted around to check, but I can't find any recordings of this part of the event. The wording may have varied slightly, as this collection happened a number of times each year.

Helpfully, they give information in the annual filings of Soul Survivor. In the 2017 we read of the plan to:

"Take a collection at each of the summer events to be used towards activities that work for social justice"

(Source: page 21 of Group of companies' accounts made up to 31 December 2017 from the Soul Survivor filings at Companies House.)

In 2016 the same phrase appears. 

(Source: page 17 of Group of companies' accounts made up to 31 December 2016 from the Soul Survivor filings at Companies House.)

That's good, right? These sort of causes seems to chime with Jesus' exhortations to serve the poor.

Excellent. 

But...

But, then the money gets split up. 

In the 2018 report, this division is described as:

"Total collection of £81,078 contributing £27,026 to each of Soul Action, Central Asia, and Soul61."

Soul61?  That feels like a stretch. 

You see, the Soul61 describes its purpose as:

"Young people are trained to serve and to lead others in the UK and around the world"

(Source: page 2 of 'Total exemption full accounts made up to 31 August 2018' from Soul61 filings at Companies House)

This isn't the same as social justice. The young leaders may have no intention to work in social justice in the future. And even if they did, the money isn't going directly on social justice. Perhaps if they were training existing leaders of social justice programmes Soul Survivor could claim that.

The 2016 filings are quite interesting. The trustees give a paragraph to explaining each division of the collection. But not Soul61. No explanation there.

Is this approach fair to the people making gifts?

Actually, given the audience of Soul Survivor, we should ask ourselves: is this approach fair to the children making gifts? (A sizeable chunk of the donors will have been under 18.)

And, as we've just seen most of this money was spent on Mike Pilavachi interns.

Did teenagers and adults giving to social justice expect that the money would end up funding travel expenses for interns to shadow him?

Here's the breakdown of the portion of the festival collection that reaches Soul61:

Financial year Money received by Soul61 from collections
2011/2012 £30,150
2012/2013 £33,908
2013/2014 £34,147
2014/2015 £31,528
2015/2016 £40,721
2016/2017 £27,228
2017/2018 £35,123
2018/2019 £30,972
2019/2020 £0 (no events happened in 2020)

This wasn't a one-off. This was normal. Every year for 8 years.


The church connection

The other regular source of funding for Soul61 is the Soul Survivor Watford church/charity. Again, there are two parts to this.

Every year £12,000 is donated from Soul Survivor Watford to Soul61. Some years this amount was bigger, for example in the 2016/2017 financial year it was £24,500. In the first financial year of Soul61 operation, 2011/2012, there was a particularly big donation of £44,641.

As before,  in practice this was a charity that Mike Pilavachi leads (or co-leads with Croft in later years), moving some of its funds to another charity that he is a trustee of. To pay for an operation that he runs.

Pilavachi was a trustee of Soul Survivor Watford and a trustee of Soul61.

How do the leaders of the church describe this money transfer to church members?

Do they even mention it?

I wonder if they say "We donate to Soul61" and let people jump to the conclusion that this money supports the paid-gap-year programme that the charity also runs. That programme provided many of the people who help run the Sunday services at SSW.

Because, according to their filings, the money doesn't go there. Instead, most of it goes on the Mike Pilavachi interns.

Sometimes Soul Survivor Watford will have a collection in a service specifically for Soul61. When that happens it's on top of the £12,000 and is labelled differently. In this example, from the 2015/2016 report it's labelled 'Soul Survivor Watford celebration offering':

Income from donations, 2015-2016

I should point out the giving is very normal in the Christian world. Most church services have a moment where people give money. My experience in 9 churches is that there's rarely pressure, but I realise that experience may differ.  

In total, in 2011-2021, Soul Survivor Watford provide £188,905 of funding to Soul61.

You know, it strikes me that this arrangement of separate charities would be a good way to limit objections to intern funding. Church leaders could say "We're giving to Soul61, to fund young leader development" without mentioning the interns specifically. Once the money moves to the Soul61 charity it's likely hidden from the view of staff, trustees, and church members.

More Soul Survivor blogs



Updates

An earlier version of this post mistakenly used the phrase:
'In 2016 it was phrased slightly differently:
"Take a collection at each of the summer events to be used towards activities that work for social justice."'
That was amended to:
'In 2016 the same phrase appears.'

Thanks for the correction Sally and Kate. 

Thursday, 3 August 2023

Pilavachi, Greig and the Christian Leader Playbook

In the past few months I've been digging into the workings of Soul Survivor. By an accident of timing my social media feeds have been filling up with posts by another Christian leader: Pete Greig. The juxtaposition of these has been both jarring and thought-provoking.

Greig majors on prayer and on many of the ancient spiritual disciplines. It might be easy to grasp at these as a reaction to the Pilavachi investigation, and to scandals at churches like Mars Hill and Willow Creek.

But, I can see Greig using some of the same techniques and approaches Pilavachi uses in his ministry. And these approaches are part of what helped Pilavachi to get away with his behaviour for so long. They're almost like a weird sort of church-leader-playbook.

I am not suggesting the Pete Greig is guilty of any of the harmful behaviours that Pilavachi has been accused of.

Greig's face gets around, like Pilavachi's did. You come across it on conference programmes and on his social media posts. Do you see how in this post, the photo is Greig doing the discipline? Not just a photo of the labyrinth  itself?

Speaking of conferences, like Pilavachi Greig has travelled internationally as a Christian speaker. Here's when he was in Hawaii. Other trips include California and Cape Town. 

I have a concern about international speaking. As your teaching reaches people more geographically distant, the ability of your audience to check for hypocrisy grows smaller. It's like the further you project an image, the dimmer it gets. I bet Pilavachi's audiences in Toronto were less aware of his faults than those in Watford.

As the sentence 'international speaker' finds its way into your bio, people start to view you differently. You're seen as successful. You become more famous. That brings the odd fame-shield we see in other areas of culture. 

I wonder if the challenges of individuals lose their potency. A person holding you to account publicly becomes 1 of 40,000 followers rather than 1 of 200. Maybe not. 

Critically, you become too big to fail. If people have been damaged by your behaviour, they start to ask themselves "how will people believe me?" "Will I cause people to lose faith?". This can be the same with any church leader, but I think those internal doubts grow stronger in proportion to a leader's fame. 

Like Pilavachi Greig is an author: 8 books so far. These books give his voice reach, and give him fame and earnings. I imagine a large number of Christians in the UK will recognise his name.

Greig's church is similar in scale than Soul Survivor Watford: £1.9 million income in 2021/2022, 38 staff members. They have a full-time head of communications, and a part-time broadcast technician.

Like Pilavachi he seems to be be split between two organisations: Emmaus Rd Church and the 24:7 Prayer charity. When he tweets about a life of simplicity, can we ask him about the simplicity of leading two organisation as once? Or leading a church so large there was 38 staff members (some part-time)?

This dual role creates complexities. I see money shifting between the two. Do they also borrow premises space from each other? Accountability gets harder here, at its does with the Soul Survivor group of charities

I notice both these organisations are heavily involved in the Wildfires festival that has run since 2018. Sounds like a familiar concept, albeit on a small scale.

I'm not say Greig had done anything wrong.

I am saying that behind his posts about retreats, and silence, and ancient practices, you find a familiar-looking church/charity/festival machine.

Questions for him - what measures are in place to hold you accountable? How are they better than those found in Soul Survivor?